MILK LOAD TESTING FACES NEW HITCH

By DON STONEMAN

The Snap test kit and other inhibitor detection field devices are great at picking up drug residues. Sometimes a little too good. This is costing the dairy industry money in downtime while a laboratory test confirms that milk is safe for consumers. One drug, Ceftiofur, sold under the trade name Excenel Sterile Powder, shows up at extremely low levels in field tests. Dairy farmers don't need to withhold milk from cows injected for respiratory diseases with this drug. However, residues do appear at levels as low as four parts per billion (ppb) about half the time when the drug is infused into cow's udders. This is an off-label use, explains Dairy Farmers of Ontario's George MacNaughton, manager of farm policies and programs. Farmers with this level of residue showing up in their milk are not necessarily at fault, since this treatment can be prescribed by a veterinarian. Ceftiofur is equally likely to show up with any of the test kits, MacNaughton says. Snap and the other kits guarantee they can detect drug residues at 50 ppb 100 per cent of the time. But they will pick up certain drug residues about half the time at much lower levels. "All the test kits are the same. This is not particular to the Snap," he says. "We can't say its wrong" for that drug to be in milk at extremely low levels, but if a vet didn't write a prescription for producers, they aren't supposed to use the drug, he warns. The issue is costing the dairy industry money because of downtime for milk board employees, processors and truckers. Milk board staff have to run the sample to the airport, and someone else has to pick it up in Toronto and take it to Guelph to get a result within 24 hours. In the meantime, the truck full of milk has to sit at the plant until results come back. This happens 15 to 20 times a month, and 10 of these positives will come from Ceftiofur-treated cows. This doesn't help milk quality either because the truck is insulated, but not refrigerated. It's a question as to whether costs should be borne by the producer for these extra services, MacNaughton says. The issue was to go to the raw milk quality committee at presstime, says its chairman, Drumbo milk producer Grant MacLaren. He was not prepared to speculate on what options might be available to the board. Of paramount importance is food safety, he said. That's why the load testing program is now in place. Extremely sensitive tests are a shortcoming of the new program. "The question is, what is the health issue? What is happening at the farm to cause that?" MacLaren says. "We want to make sure we are meeting our commitments to processors and consumers." There are a number of field tests being used, MacNaughton says. They all have the about the same ranges of sensitivity.

back