Fasten seatbelts for '96 U.S. Farm Bill

By TOM BUTTON

It will be a roller coaster ride, and it's time to learn how to strap on the seatbelts. That's the fast growing consensus as the U.S. Congress and President Bill Clinton get set to unleash a new farm bill that will dominate American farm policy for the next seven years. There's also consensus that Ontario farmers have no choice but climb on that roller coaster. The only way off is to stop growing corn, soybeans and wheat. "We're going to see a lot more price volatility," predicts George McCaw, policy analyst for the Ontario agriculture ministry assigned to tracking farm bill impacts on farmers north of the border. "American corn planting will go through the roof next spring," McCaw expects. "The year after that, we'll see a big swing to soybeans. "Instead of being locked into historical planting patterns in order to make sure they keep getting their government cheques, American farmers will have a lot more flexibility to respond to market signals." Clinton and the Congress face a Dec. 31 deadline to put the finishing touches on the 1995 farm bill. Intense talks continue to focus on myriad details, but it looks as if Republicans in the House and Senate are the big winners. The new farm bill will do the two things the Republicans insist on. It will chop federal spending, cutting US$2 billion in subsidies to farmers. But it will also get Washington out of farmers' decisions, allowing them to plant what they want where they want. Indeed, the Congressional version of the bill emphasizes that point with its name, the Agricultural Market Transition Program. See page 27 for details. But will it put Canadian and American farmers on a more level playing field? "It depends on how prices evolve," McCaw says. "Under most scenarios, the Americans will continue to get more than Ontario producers." The final farm bill will likely authorize cheques to American farmers, whether prices are high or low. The single biggest change in U.S. farm policy is that subsidies won't be linked to either prices or production. Instead, American farmers will get essentially the same federal cheque, no matter what they grow and what they earn. Ontario farmers, by contrast, will get more government help in years with poor crops or poor harvests. In order for Ontario farmers to get the same level of support as American farmers under the new farm bill, therefore, markets will have to be bleak. Brian Doidge, economist at Ridgetown college, says Ontario corn and soybean producers will be forced to do a much better job protecting themselves against market risks. "Right now we've got about 15 per cent of producers using options, up from about five per cent when we first started talking about them 10 years ago," Doidge says. "With the new farm bill, everybody is going to have to know how to use options." Doidge is already telling farmers to pencil out their cost of production. "Watch it like a hawk," he says. "And not just fertilizer and seed. You've got to know your overhead too." He is also urging growers to get used to selling crop up to three years before they grow it when there is a chance to lock in profit, and then protect themselves with options or hedging strategies. "There's no question there are going to be big swings in U.S. corn and soybean acreage," Doidge says. "That means big swings in prices too, and a lot of pressure on farmers to learn risk management." Terry Daynard, executive vice president of the Ontario Corn Producers Association warns that the U.S. government won't be able to resist meddling in farm politics. "We're seeing a long-term, seven-year commitment to reduce costs, but all kinds of things are going to happen in those seven years, including two presidential elections," Daynard points out. "It sounds good, but I'm not sure it's going to happen. "The biggest downside is that it's going to take away a lot of the set-aside requirements," Daynard says. The loss of the set-aside should boost corn plantings, he points out, but the new rules on planting flexibility will let farmers grow crops such as soybeans that they veered away from in past because of lower subsidy levels. "There's going to be more of everything," Daynard says. And while he agrees the farm bill paves the way for pricing volatility, he thinks the fact most corn growers also grow soybeans and vice versa should moderate the effect on a farmer's overall income. Daynard is also far from sure the volatility will be much greater than farmers have had to cope with under previous farm bills. "One of the factors that has caused a lot of volatility has been the U.S. government jumping in and out of the market," he says. "I'm not sure it could get any worse. "However it turns out, I'm glad [provincial agriculture ministry] Noble Villenueve is taking GRIP coverage to 85 per cent," Daynard adds. "We may need it."

back